Authors needs are changing.


Societies and publishers should evolve with them.

Many researchers want more control of how - and when - they share their research. How are your journals evolving to meet these changing needs and expectations? Through In Review, we can help you adapt while also enabling the success of your authors.

Learn more below, then contact us to discuss integrating your journal.

500

journals

Nearly 500 journals are using In Review integration.

40%

opting in

Authors are opting to join In Review 40% of the time.

100,000

Preprints

Nearly 100,000 preprints have been posted on Research Square, covering hundreds of disciplines.

In Review

For Publishers and Societies

In Review helps you quickly and seamlessly integrate preprinting into your manuscript submission process without the need to build or manage a separate preprint platform.

The value of In Review to Publishers and Societies

Partner with us
In Review

For Authors

Using In Review, authors can publish their manuscripts as preprints on Research Square while submitting them to participating journals. If the manuscript is not accepted, the author may still submit to other journals, but their work will remain on the Research Square preprint platform.

The value of In Review to Authors

Immediately upon publication of the preprint, the primacy of their work is established. Authors can also track and immediately see status changes as their manuscripts advance through the peer-review process.

  • A peer-review timeline with instant status updates as your manuscript moves through the peer-review process
  • Established primacy of your findings upon publication of your preprint
  • Access to your preliminary paper while readers await your peer-reviewed publication
  • A citable DOI for your preprinted manuscript
  • Access to our tools and services for manuscript improvement, like community comments, language assessment tools, and more
  • A link from the preprint to the latest published version of record
  • Access to our tools and services for manuscript improvement, like community comments, language assessment tools, and more
  • Full-text indexing for better search engine discoverability
  • Attractive HTML formatting for all preprints. This allows better readability, image resizing, and figure downloads.

"I opted-in because I knew I should be submitting preprints, but I didn’t know where to start. In Review made it convenient."

In Review author, Johns Hopkins University

"Every publication should have a system like In Review, where everyone can see when and where you submitted."

Pritam Sukul, University Medicine Rostock